business-haroun/mba/ch50.org
2025-01-26 14:19:46 +02:00

310 lines
18 KiB
Org Mode
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

#+title: Section 9 | Lesson 50 - How to Value Private Companies and Growth Methods
#+HTML_HEAD: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../_share/media/css/org-media-sass/categories/business.css" />
* Links
- [[./../mba-main.org][TOC | Business]]
- [[https://www.udemy.com/course/an-entire-mba-in-1-courseaward-winning-business-school-prof/learn/lecture/5805330#overview][S09:L50. How To Value Private Companies the Easy Way & Growth Methods]]
- tables: [[file:../_data/market share spreadsheet.numbers][Market Share Spreadsheet.numbers]]
* Notes
** Financial Table
| Year | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|-----------------------------------+-----------+------------+-------------+-------------|
| Revenue | 2,000,000 | 20,000,000 | 350,000,000 | 661,500,000 |
| COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) | 1,800,000 | 16,000,000 | 175,000,000 | 264,600,000 |
| Gross Profit | 200,000 | 4,000,000 | 175,000,000 | 396,900,000 |
| Gross Margin % | 10% | 20% | 50% | 60% |
|-----------------------------------+-----------+------------+-------------+-------------|
| *Gross Profit = Revenue - COGS* | | | | |
| *GM pct = Gross Profit / Revenue* | | | | |
** Financial Table: Operating Expenses
| Category | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
|----------------------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
| Sales & Marketing | ₪500,000.00 | ₪4,000,000.00 | ₪66,500,000.00 | ₪112,455,000.00 |
| % of sales | 25% | 20% | 19% | 17% |
| % YOY | | | | |
|----------------------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
| General & Administrative | ₪500,000.00 | ₪4,000,000.00 | ₪66,500,000.00 | ₪112,455,000.00 |
| % of sales | 25% | 20% | 19% | 17% |
| % YOY | | | | |
|----------------------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
| Research & Development | ₪4,000,000.00 | ₪20,000,000.00 | ₪24,500,000.00 | ₪26,460,000.00 |
| % of sales | 200% | 100% | 7% | 4% |
| % YOY | | | | |
|----------------------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
| *Operating Expenses Total* | ₪5,000,000.00 | ₪28,000,000.00 | ₪157,500,000.00 | ₪251,370,000.00 |
*** Operating Expenses
these can also be found in every company
- Sales & Marketing
- General & Administrative
- Research & Development
*** how to calculate
1. go see similar publicly traded companies and find out what percent of revenue/sales
- security and exchange commision requires all publicly traded companies to put this up
2. from the initial point we make assumptions
** Operating Profit (EBIT)
- the company is breaking even when Total Operating Expenses equals or exceeds Gross Profit
- In the example, this occurs in year 2017
\[ \text{Operating Profit (EBIT)} = \text{Gross Profit} - \text{Operating Expenses Total} \]
*** Key Components of EBIT
1. *Revenue*: Total income from sales or services.
2. *COGS (Cost of Goods Sold)*: The direct costs of producing the goods or services sold by the company.
3. *Gross Profit*: Revenue minus COGS.
4. *Operating Expenses*: Costs not directly tied to production, such as:
- Sales & Marketing
- General & Administrative (G&A)
- Research & Development (R&D)
*** Why EBIT Is Important
1. *Operational Focus*: EBIT shows how efficiently a company runs its operations without considering external factors like financing (interest) or tax obligations.
2. *Comparison*: Useful for comparing companies in the same industry, as it ignores the effects of different tax rates and financing structures.
3. *Profitability Analysis*: Highlights whether the core business is profitable.
** What is YOY?
*** Definition
YOY stands for *Year-over-Year*. It is a method of comparing data from one period (usually a year) to the same period in the previous year. YOY is often used in business, finance, and economics to evaluate *growth*, *performance*, or *trends* over time.
*** Formula
\[ \text{YOY % Change} = \frac{\text{Current Year Value} - \text{Previous Year Value}}{\text{Previous Year Value}} \times 100 \]
*** Why YOY Is Important
1. *Growth Analysis*: YOY highlights whether a metric (like revenue, profit, or expenses) is increasing or decreasing compared to the previous year.
2. *Seasonal Neutrality*: YOY comparisons help account for seasonality, as the same time periods are compared.
3. *Trend Insights*: Helps identify long-term trends and patterns by consistently comparing yearly changes.
*** Example
Calculate YOY for *Revenue*:
| Year | Revenue (₪) | YOY % Change |
|------|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| 2016 | ₪20,000,000.00 | \((20,000,000 - 2,000,000) / 2,000,000 \times 100 = 900\%\) |
| 2017 | ₪350,000,000.00 | \((350,000,000 - 20,000,000) / 20,000,000 \times 100 = 1650\%\) |
| 2018 | ₪661,500,000.00 | \((661,500,000 - 350,000,000) / 350,000,000 \times 100 = 89\%\) |
| 2019 | ₪999,600,000.00 | \((999,600,000 - 661,500,000) / 661,500,000 \times 100 = 51\%\) |
| 2020 | ₪1,399,440,000.00 | \((1,399,440,000 - 999,600,000) / 999,600,000 \times 100 = 40\%\) |
*** Updated Financial Table
| Year | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|-----------------------------------+------------+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+----------------|
| Revenue | ₪2,000,000 | ₪20,000,000 | ₪350,000,000 | ₪661,500,000 | ₪999,600,000 | ₪1,399,440,000 |
| COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) | ₪1,800,000 | ₪16,000,000 | ₪175,000,000 | ₪264,600,000 | ₪299,880,000 | ₪279,888,000 |
| Gross Profit | ₪200,000 | ₪4,000,000 | ₪175,000,000 | ₪396,900,000 | ₪699,720,000 | ₪1,119,552,000 |
| Gross Margin % | 10% | 20% | 50% | 60% | 70% | 80% |
| YOY | 0 | 900% | 1650% | 89% | 51% | 40% |
|-----------------------------------+------------+-------------+--------------+--------------+--------------+----------------|
| *Gross Profit = Revenue - COGS* | | | | | | |
| *GM pct = Gross Profit / Revenue* | | | | | | |
*** Uses of YOY
1. *Revenue Growth*: Are sales increasing year over year?
2. *Expense Management*: Are costs growing faster than revenue?
3. *Profitability Trends*: Is the business becoming more or less profitable over time?
4. *Operational Insights*: Are marketing or R&D expenses increasing efficiently year over year?
** taxes and interest
| | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|-------------------------------+------------+--------------+---------------|
| Revenue | ₪2,000,000 | ₪20,000,000 | ₪350,000,000 |
| COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) | ₪1,800,000 | ₪16,000,000 | ₪175,000,000 |
| Gross Profit (Revenue - COGS) | ₪200,000 | ₪4,000,000 | ₪175,000,000 |
| Total Operating Expenses | ₪5,000,000 | ₪28,000,000 | ₪157,500,000 |
| EBIT (Gross Profit - TOE) | -₪4,800,00 | -₪24,000,000 | *₪17,500,000* |
| Interest | | | ₪85,000.00 |
| Tax | | | ₪4,250,000.00 |
| % of EBIT | | | 24.29% |
*** % of EBIT formula
\[
\text{Tax as \% of EBIT} = \left( \frac{\text{Tax Amount}}{\text{EBIT}} \right) \times 100
\]
*** Why No Taxes Before 2017?
**** Taxes Are Based on Profit (EBIT)
- Corporate taxes are typically calculated as a percentage of **profit** (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, EBIT).
- If the EBIT is **negative** (i.e., the company has an operating loss), theres no taxable income, and thus no corporate income tax is owed.
**** Losses in 2015 and 2016
- EBIT values:
- 2015: -₪4,800,000
- 2016: -₪24,000,000
- Since the company had **operating losses** during these years, there was no taxable profit.
**** Profit in 2017
- EBIT in 2017: ₪17,500,000.
- By 2017, the company had a positive EBIT, meaning taxable profit existed, and taxes were applied from that year onward.
*** How Losses Affect Taxes - Loss Carryforward
- Many tax systems allow companies to carry forward losses from previous years to offset future taxable income.
- Loss carryforwards reduce taxes owed in profitable years.
*** No Tax Obligation Without Profit
- If a company doesnt generate profit, it generally doesnt pay income taxes.
- Other taxes (e.g., payroll, VAT, property taxes) may still apply.
*** Conclusion
- Taxes werent calculated before 2017 because the company didnt have taxable profit.
- Once the company turned a profit in 2017, taxes were applied.
** IP Valuation: Growth vs Value
- *Assume an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2020*
- Based on the Financial data given, how and what will different types of investors PAY for this company
| Category | 2020 |
|---------------------------------+-------------------|
| Revenue | ₪1,399,440,000 |
| EBIT (Gross Profit - TOE) | ₪657,736,800 |
*** Growth Investors
- focus on *revenue* as the primary metric
- especially for high growth companies
- take the revenue in the year of the IP and multiply it by 10, that is what they expect the company will be worth in 5 years
\[
\text{Growth Investor Valuation} = \text{Revenue for IPO Year} \times 10
\]
*** Value Investors
- they look on the long term viability of a product vs it's fast growth
- buy cheap, sell after many years
- focus on *current profitability* (earnings, ie EBIT)
- lower valuations for high growth companies
- high growth companies reinvest profits into expansion, research, etc.
\[
\text{Value Investor Valuation} = \text{EBIT for IPO Year} \times 10
\]
*** Final valuations based on 2020 IPO
assuming the IPO takes place in 2020 our valuation will be
| Investor type | Formula | Projected Valuation in 5 Years (2025) |
|------------------+--------------+----------------------------------------|
| Growth Investors | Revenue x 10 | *₪13,994,400,000* |
| Value Investors | EBIT x 10 | *₪6,577,368,000* |
** sustainabile growth
*** how it works
- sustainable growth is the maximum growth rate a company can achieve without additional equity or debt financing
\[
\text{Sustainable Growth} = \frac{ \text{ending equity} - \text{beginning equity} }{\text{beginning equity}}
\]
- you want to grow BELOW the sustainable growth rate so as to not require outside help
*** basic example
| sustainability growth example | |
|-------------------------------+------------------|
| beginning equity | $ 351,597,690 |
| ending equity | $ 860,108,490 |
| sustainable growth rate | 145% |
| 2020 growth rate | 98% |
- not sure where he got the values for beg and ending equity. assuming it's from somewhere else because it doesn't actual match up
- the values for growth rate probably come from EBIT or operational revenue, and if calculated using the growth rate formula, come out to 94% not 98%
*** More extensive Example where dividend are 0
| Column Name | Value | Formula / Notes |
|---------------------------+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------|
| Year | 2020 | |
| Revenue | ₪1,399,440,000 | |
| COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) | ₪279,888,000 | |
| Gross Profit | ₪1,119,552,000 | Revenue - COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) |
| Operating Expenses Total | ₪461,815,200 | |
| Operating Profit (EBIT) | ₪657,736,800 | |
| Interest | ₪85,000 | Given |
| Tax | ₪159,764,269 | Assuming tax rate of 24.29% |
| Net Income | ₪497,887,531 | Operating Profit - Interest - Tax |
| Beginning Equity | ₪699,720,000 | |
| Ending Equity | ₪1,197,607,531 | Beginning Equity + Net Income |
| Average Equity | ₪948,663,765.5 | (Beginning Equity + Ending Equity) / 2 |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | 0.00 | |
| ROE (Return on Equity) | 52.48% | Net Income / Average Equity |
| Sustainable Growth Rate | 52.48% | ROE * (1 - Dividend Payout Ratio) |
| Actual Growth Rate | 71.16% | (Ending Equity - Beginning Equity) / Beginning Equity |
- here beginning equity was based on 2019 Gross Profit
- different beginning equity values lead to VASTLY different results
- NOTE: you can see that the Sustainable Growth Rate, is very far bellow the Actual Growth Rate with 52.48% to 71.16%
*** example where a dividend payout of 44% was expected
| Column Name | Value | Formula |
|---------------------------+----------------+-------------------------------------------------------|
| Year | 2020 | |
| Revenue | ₪1,399,440,000 | |
| COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) | ₪279,888,000 | |
| Gross Profit | ₪1,119,552,000 | Revenue - COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) |
| Operating Expenses Total | ₪461,815,200 | |
| Operating Profit (EBIT) | ₪657,736,800 | |
| Interest | ₪85,000 | Given |
| Tax | ₪159,764,269 | Assuming tax rate of 24.29% |
| Net Income | ₪497,887,531 | Operating Profit - Interest - Tax |
| Beginning Equity | ₪699,720,000 | |
| Ending Equity | ₪1,197,607,531 | Beginning Equity + Net Income |
| Average Equity | ₪948,663,765.5 | (Beginning Equity + Ending Equity) / 2 |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | 0.40 | |
| ROE (Return on Equity) | 52.48% | Net Income / Average Equity |
| Sustainable Growth Rate | 31.49% | ROE * (1 - Dividend Payout Ratio) |
| Actual Growth Rate | 71.16% | (Ending Equity - Beginning Equity) / Beginning Equity |
- note the Sustainable Growth rate is worse at 31.49%
- incidentally if I try to change the Beginning Equity to a different metric, ie such as revenue which is around 999m, the SGR becomes EVEN WORSE
*** retained earnings
- part of equity
- how much profit derived over the years
** playing with equations
*** go through the following equations
1. \[\text{ROE (return on equity)} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{equity}} \]
2.
\[\text{ROE (return on equity)} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{equity}} \times 1 \times 1 \]
3.
\[\text{ROE (return on equity)} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{equity}} \times \frac{\text{sales}}{\text{sales}} \times \frac{\text{assets}}{\text{assets}} \]
4.
\[\text{ROE (return on equity)} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{sales}} \times \frac{\text{sales}}{\text{assets}} \times \frac{\text{assets}}{\text{equity}} \]
*** Lets break down this equation and define its parts
**** first define ROE as Growth
\[\text{Growth (ROE ie. return on equity)} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{sales}} \times \frac{\text{sales}}{\text{assets}} \times \frac{\text{assets}}{\text{equity}} \]
**** now define the other parts of this equation
1. Net Profit Margin is Net Income over Sales
\[
\text{Net Profit Margin} = \frac{\text{net income}}{\text{sales}}
\]
2. Asset Turnover is Sales over Assets
\[
\text{Asset Turnover} = \frac{\text{sales}}{\text{assets}}
\]
3. Equity Multiplier is Asset over Equity
\[
\text{Equity Multiplier} = \frac{\text{assets}}{\text{equity}}
\]
*** redefine the equation
\[\text{Growth} = \text{Net Profit Margin} \times \text{Asset Turnover} \times \text{Equity Multiplier} \]
by increaseing one of the three parts of the equation you can increase growth
1. Net Profit Margin
2. Asset Turnover
3. Equity Multiplier